draft-ietf-dime-ovli-07.txt   draft-ietf-dime-ovli-08.txt 
Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) J. Korhonen, Ed. Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) J. Korhonen, Ed.
Internet-Draft Broadcom Internet-Draft Broadcom
Intended status: Standards Track S. Donovan, Ed. Intended status: Standards Track S. Donovan, Ed.
Expires: July 30, 2015 B. Campbell Expires: August 8, 2015 B. Campbell
Oracle Oracle
L. Morand L. Morand
Orange Labs Orange Labs
January 26, 2015 February 4, 2015
Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance
draft-ietf-dime-ovli-07.txt draft-ietf-dime-ovli-08.txt
Abstract Abstract
This specification defines a base solution for Diameter overload This specification defines a base solution for Diameter overload
control, referred to as Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance control, referred to as Diameter Overload Indication Conveyance
(DOIC). (DOIC).
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
skipping to change at page 1, line 36 skipping to change at page 1, line 36
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 30, 2015. This Internet-Draft will expire on August 8, 2015.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 27, line 31 skipping to change at page 27, line 31
7.8. Attribute Value Pair flag rules 7.8. Attribute Value Pair flag rules
+---------+ +---------+
|AVP flag | |AVP flag |
|rules | |rules |
+----+----+ +----+----+
AVP Section | |MUST| AVP Section | |MUST|
Attribute Name Code Defined Value Type |MUST| NOT| Attribute Name Code Defined Value Type |MUST| NOT|
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
|OC-Supported-Features TBD1 6.1 Grouped | | V | |OC-Supported-Features TBD1 7.1 Grouped | | V |
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
|OC-Feature-Vector TBD2 6.2 Unsigned64 | | V | |OC-Feature-Vector TBD2 7.2 Unsigned64 | | V |
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
|OC-OLR TBD3 6.3 Grouped | | V | |OC-OLR TBD3 7.3 Grouped | | V |
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
|OC-Sequence-Number TBD4 6.4 Unsigned64 | | V | |OC-Sequence-Number TBD4 7.4 Unsigned64 | | V |
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
|OC-Validity-Duration TBD5 6.5 Unsigned32 | | V | |OC-Validity-Duration TBD5 7.5 Unsigned32 | | V |
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
|OC-Report-Type TBD6 6.6 Enumerated | | V | |OC-Report-Type TBD6 7.6 Enumerated | | V |
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
|OC-Reduction | | | |OC-Reduction | | |
| -Percentage TBD7 6.7 Unsigned32 | | V | | -Percentage TBD7 7.7 Unsigned32 | | V |
+--------------------------------------------------+----+----+ +--------------------------------------------------+----+----+
As described in the Diameter base protocol [RFC6733], the M-bit usage As described in the Diameter base protocol [RFC6733], the M-bit usage
for a given AVP in a given command may be defined by the application. for a given AVP in a given command may be defined by the application.
8. Error Response Codes 8. Error Response Codes
When a DOIC node rejects a Diameter request due to overload, the DOIC When a DOIC node rejects a Diameter request due to overload, the DOIC
node MUST select an appropriate error response code. This node MUST select an appropriate error response code. This
determination is made based on the probability of the request determination is made based on the probability of the request
 End of changes. 11 change blocks. 
11 lines changed or deleted 11 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/