draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-07.txt   draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-08.txt 
DMM Working Group S. Matsushima DMM Working Group S. Matsushima
Internet-Draft SoftBank Internet-Draft SoftBank
Intended status: Standards Track L. Bertz Intended status: Standards Track L. Bertz
Expires: September 14, 2017 Sprint Expires: March 17, 2018 Sprint
M. Liebsch M. Liebsch
NEC NEC
S. Gundavelli S. Gundavelli
Cisco Cisco
D. Moses D. Moses
Intel Corporation Intel Corporation
C. Perkins C. Perkins
Futurewei Futurewei
March 13, 2017 September 13, 2017
Protocol for Forwarding Policy Configuration (FPC) in DMM Protocol for Forwarding Policy Configuration (FPC) in DMM
draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-07 draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-08
Abstract Abstract
This document describes a way, called Forwarding Policy Configuration This document describes a way, called Forwarding Policy Configuration
(FPC) to manage the separation of data-plane and control-plane. FPC (FPC) to manage the separation of data-plane and control-plane. FPC
defines a flexible mobility management system using FPC agent and FPC defines a flexible mobility management system using FPC agent and FPC
client functions. An FPC agent provides an abstract interface to the client functions. An FPC agent provides an abstract interface to the
data-plane. The FPC client configures data-plane nodes by using the data-plane. The FPC client configures data-plane nodes by using the
functions and abstractions provided by the FPC agent for that data- functions and abstractions provided by the FPC agent for that data-
plane nodes. The data-plane abstractions presented in this document plane nodes. The data-plane abstractions presented in this document
skipping to change at page 1, line 47 skipping to change at page 1, line 47
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 14, 2017. This Internet-Draft will expire on March 17, 2018.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 67, line 28 skipping to change at page 67, line 28
Participants in the FPSM work team discussion include Satoru Participants in the FPSM work team discussion include Satoru
Matsushima, Danny Moses, Sri Gundavelli, Marco Liebsch, Pierrick Matsushima, Danny Moses, Sri Gundavelli, Marco Liebsch, Pierrick
Seite, Alper Yegin, Carlos Bernardos, Charles Perkins and Fred Seite, Alper Yegin, Carlos Bernardos, Charles Perkins and Fred
Templin. Templin.
12. References 12. References
12.1. Normative References 12.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-6man-segment-routing-header] [I-D.ietf-6man-segment-routing-header]
Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Field, B., Leung, I., Linkova, Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Raza, K., Leddy, J., Field, B.,
J., Aries, E., Kosugi, T., Vyncke, E., and D. Lebrun, daniel.voyer@bell.ca, d., daniel.bernier@bell.ca, d.,
Matsushima, S., Leung, I., Linkova, J., Aries, E., Kosugi,
T., Vyncke, E., Lebrun, D., Steinberg, D., and R. Raszuk,
"IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", draft-ietf-6man- "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)", draft-ietf-6man-
segment-routing-header-05 (work in progress), February segment-routing-header-07 (work in progress), July 2017.
2017.
[I-D.ietf-sfc-nsh] [I-D.ietf-sfc-nsh]
Quinn, P. and U. Elzur, "Network Service Header", draft- Quinn, P., Elzur, U., and C. Pignataro, "Network Service
ietf-sfc-nsh-12 (work in progress), February 2017. Header (NSH)", draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-20 (work in progress),
September 2017.
[I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls] [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls]
Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B., Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B.,
Litkowski, S., Horneffer, M., Shakir, R., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing with MPLS
jefftant@gmail.com, j., and E. Crabbe, "Segment Routing data plane", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls-10
with MPLS data plane", draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing- (work in progress), June 2017.
mpls-07 (work in progress), February 2017.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC6088] Tsirtsis, G., Giarreta, G., Soliman, H., and N. Montavont, [RFC6088] Tsirtsis, G., Giarreta, G., Soliman, H., and N. Montavont,
"Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings", RFC 6088, "Traffic Selectors for Flow Bindings", RFC 6088,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6088, January 2011, DOI 10.17487/RFC6088, January 2011, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6088>. editor.org/info/rfc6088>.
[RFC6089] Tsirtsis, G., Soliman, H., Montavont, N., Giaretta, G., [RFC6089] Tsirtsis, G., Soliman, H., Montavont, N., Giaretta, G.,
and K. Kuladinithi, "Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and and K. Kuladinithi, "Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and
Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support", RFC 6089, Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support", RFC 6089,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6089, January 2011, DOI 10.17487/RFC6089, January 2011, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6089>. editor.org/info/rfc6089>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7333] Chan, H., Ed., Liu, D., Seite, P., Yokota, H., and J. [RFC7333] Chan, H., Ed., Liu, D., Seite, P., Yokota, H., and J.
Korhonen, "Requirements for Distributed Mobility Korhonen, "Requirements for Distributed Mobility
Management", RFC 7333, DOI 10.17487/RFC7333, August 2014, Management", RFC 7333, DOI 10.17487/RFC7333, August 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7333>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7333>.
12.2. Informative References 12.2. Informative References
[I-D.bertz-dime-policygroups] [I-D.bertz-dime-policygroups]
Bertz, L. and M. Bales, "Diameter Policy Groups and Sets", Bertz, L. and M. Bales, "Diameter Policy Groups and Sets",
draft-bertz-dime-policygroups-03 (work in progress), March draft-bertz-dime-policygroups-04 (work in progress), June
2017. 2017.
[I-D.ietf-dmm-deployment-models] [I-D.ietf-dmm-deployment-models]
Gundavelli, S. and S. Jeon, "DMM Deployment Models and Gundavelli, S. and S. Jeon, "DMM Deployment Models and
Architectural Considerations", draft-ietf-dmm-deployment- Architectural Considerations", draft-ietf-dmm-deployment-
models-01 (work in progress), February 2017. models-02 (work in progress), August 2017.
[I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf] [I-D.ietf-netconf-restconf]
Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18 (work in Protocol", draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18 (work in
progress), October 2016. progress), October 2016.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>. editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC5213] Gundavelli, S., Ed., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., [RFC5213] Gundavelli, S., Ed., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V.,
Chowdhury, K., and B. Patil, "Proxy Mobile IPv6", Chowdhury, K., and B. Patil, "Proxy Mobile IPv6",
RFC 5213, DOI 10.17487/RFC5213, August 2008, RFC 5213, DOI 10.17487/RFC5213, August 2008,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5213>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5213>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC7222] Liebsch, M., Seite, P., Yokota, H., Korhonen, J., and S. [RFC7222] Liebsch, M., Seite, P., Yokota, H., Korhonen, J., and S.
Gundavelli, "Quality-of-Service Option for Proxy Mobile Gundavelli, "Quality-of-Service Option for Proxy Mobile
IPv6", RFC 7222, DOI 10.17487/RFC7222, May 2014, IPv6", RFC 7222, DOI 10.17487/RFC7222, May 2014,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7222>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7222>.
Appendix A. YANG Data Model for the FPC protocol Appendix A. YANG Data Model for the FPC protocol
These modules define YANG definitions. Seven modules are defined: These modules define YANG definitions. Seven modules are defined:
o ietf-dmm-fpc (fpc) - Defines the base model and messages for FPC o ietf-dmm-fpc (fpc) - Defines the base model and messages for FPC
o ietf-dmm-fpc-base An FPC submodule that defines the information o ietf-dmm-fpc-base An FPC submodule that defines the information
model that is specified in this document model that is specified in this document
 End of changes. 20 change blocks. 
30 lines changed or deleted 31 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.45. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/