draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-03.txt   draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-04.txt 
INTERNET-DRAFT Donald Eastlake INTERNET-DRAFT Donald Eastlake
Obsoletes: 6195 Huawei Obsoletes: 6195 Huawei
Updates: 1183, 2845, 2930, 3597 Updates: 1183, 2845, 2930, 3597
Intended status: Best Current Practice Intended status: Best Current Practice
Expires: January 1, 2013 July 2, 2012 Expires: January 14, 2013 July 15, 2012
Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations
<draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-03.txt> <draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc6195bis-04.txt>
Abstract Abstract
This document specifies Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) This document specifies Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA)
parameter assignment considerations for the allocation of Domain Name parameter assignment considerations for the allocation of Domain Name
System (DNS) resource record types, CLASSes, operation codes, error System (DNS) resource record types, CLASSes, operation codes, error
codes, DNS protocol message header bits, and AFSDB resource record codes, DNS protocol message header bits, and AFSDB resource record
subtypes. It obsoletes RFC 6195 and updates RFCs 1183, 2845, 2930, subtypes. It obsoletes RFC 6195 and updates RFCs 1183, 2845, 2930,
and 3597. and 3597.
skipping to change at page 10, line 39 skipping to change at page 10, line 39
small number of Experts appointed by the IESG. Each application will small number of Experts appointed by the IESG. Each application will
be judged by an Expert selected by IANA. In any case where the be judged by an Expert selected by IANA. In any case where the
selected Expert is unavailable or states they have a conflict of selected Expert is unavailable or states they have a conflict of
interest, IANA may select another Expert from the pool. Some interest, IANA may select another Expert from the pool. Some
guidelines for the Experts are given in Section 3.1.2. guidelines for the Experts are given in Section 3.1.2.
RRTYPEs that do not meet the requirements below may nonetheless be RRTYPEs that do not meet the requirements below may nonetheless be
allocated by a Standards Action as modified by [RFC4020]. allocated by a Standards Action as modified by [RFC4020].
1. A complete template as specified in Appendix A has been posted to 1. A complete template as specified in Appendix A has been posted to
the dns-rrtype-applications@iana.org mailing list and received by the dns-rrtype-applications@ietf.org mailing list and received by
the Expert. the Expert.
Note that the posting of partially completed, draft, or Note that the posting of partially completed, draft, or
formally submitted templates to dnsext@ietf.org by the applicant formally submitted templates to dnsext@ietf.org by the applicant
or Expert for comment and discussion is highly encouraged. Formal or Expert for comment and discussion is highly encouraged. Formal
submission of an RRTYPE template without consideration of some submission of an RRTYPE template without consideration of some
community review can be expected to increase the probability of community review can be expected to increase the probability of
initial rejection leading to a need to re-submit after initial rejection leading to a need to re-submit after
modification. modification.
2. The RR for which an RRTYPE code is being requested is either (a) a 2. The RR for which an RRTYPE code is being requested is either (a) a
skipping to change at page 18, line 37 skipping to change at page 18, line 37
Addition of text and an exclusory regular expression to Sections 3.1 Addition of text and an exclusory regular expression to Sections 3.1
and 3.2 to prohibit the use of a slight generalization of the generic and 3.2 to prohibit the use of a slight generalization of the generic
CLASS and RRTYPE names specified in [RFC3597] as the mnemonics for CLASS and RRTYPE names specified in [RFC3597] as the mnemonics for
new CLASSes and RRTYPEes. new CLASSes and RRTYPEes.
Parenthetically list "ANY" and well as "ALL" as a meaning for the "*" Parenthetically list "ANY" and well as "ALL" as a meaning for the "*"
RRTYPE. RRTYPE.
Clarify that there is one DNS error number space for headers, OPT Clarify that there is one DNS error number space for headers, OPT
extended headers, TSIG RRs, and TKEY RRs. Note the overloading of extended headers, TSIG RRs, and TKEY RRs. Note that this can be
error number 9 as well as 16. Note that this can be considered to considered to update [RFC2845] and [RFC2930]. Note the overloading of
update [RFC2845] and [RFC2930]. error number 9 as well as 16.
Update references for revised versions. Update references for revised versions.
A number of editorial changes and typo fixes. A number of editorial changes and typo fixes.
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS IANA Considerations INTERNET-DRAFT DNS IANA Considerations
Normative References Normative References
[RFC1034] - Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and [RFC1034] - Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and
skipping to change at page 20, line 23 skipping to change at page 20, line 23
May 2008. May 2008.
[RFC2671bis] - Damas, J., Graff, M., and Vixie, P., "Extension [RFC2671bis] - Damas, J., Graff, M., and Vixie, P., "Extension
Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)", draft-ietf-dnsext- Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0)", draft-ietf-dnsext-
rfc2671bis-edns0, work in progress. rfc2671bis-edns0, work in progress.
[RFCdnssecbisup] - Weiler, A. and D. Blacka, "Clarifications and [RFCdnssecbisup] - Weiler, A. and D. Blacka, "Clarifications and
Implementation Notes for DNSSECbis", draft-ietf-dnsext- Implementation Notes for DNSSECbis", draft-ietf-dnsext-
dnssec-bis-updates, work in progress. dnssec-bis-updates, work in progress.
[US-ASCII] - ANSI, "USA Standard Code for Information Interchange", [US-ASCII] - American National Standards Institute (formerly United
X3.4, American National Standards Institute: New York, States of America Standards Institute), "USA Code for
1968 Information Interchange", ANSI X3.4-1968, 1968. ANSI
X3.4-1968 has been replaced by newer versions with slight
modifications, but the 1968 version remains definitive
for the Internet.
Informative References Informative References
[Dyer1987] - Dyer, S., and F. Hsu, "Hesiod", Project Athena Technical [Dyer1987] - Dyer, S., and F. Hsu, "Hesiod", Project Athena Technical
Plan - Name Service, April 1987. Plan - Name Service, April 1987.
[Moon1981] - Moon, D., "Chaosnet", A.I. Memo 628, Massachusetts [Moon1981] - Moon, D., "Chaosnet", A.I. Memo 628, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence Institute of Technology Artificial Intelligence
Laboratory, June 1981. Laboratory, June 1981.
skipping to change at page 20, line 52 skipping to change at page 21, line 5
[RFC2606] - Eastlake 3rd, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS [RFC2606] - Eastlake 3rd, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS
Names", BCP 32, RFC 2606, June 1999. Names", BCP 32, RFC 2606, June 1999.
[RFC2673] - Crawford, M., "Binary Labels in the Domain Name System", [RFC2673] - Crawford, M., "Binary Labels in the Domain Name System",
RFC 2673, August 1999. RFC 2673, August 1999.
[RFC2931] - Eastlake 3rd, D., "DNS Request and Transaction Signatures [RFC2931] - Eastlake 3rd, D., "DNS Request and Transaction Signatures
( SIG(0)s )", RFC 2931, September 2000. ( SIG(0)s )", RFC 2931, September 2000.
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS IANA Considerations
[RFC4343] - Eastlake 3rd, D., "Domain Name System (DNS) Case [RFC4343] - Eastlake 3rd, D., "Domain Name System (DNS) Case
Insensitivity Clarification", RFC 4343, January 2006. Insensitivity Clarification", RFC 4343, January 2006.
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS IANA Considerations
[RFC5864] - Allbery, R., "DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS", RFC [RFC5864] - Allbery, R., "DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS", RFC
5864, April 2010. 5864, April 2010.
[RFC6195] - Eastlake 3rd, D., "Domain Name System (DNS) IANA [RFC6195] - Eastlake 3rd, D., "Domain Name System (DNS) IANA
Considerations", RFC 6195, March 2011. Considerations", RFC 6195, March 2011.
INTERNET-DRAFT DNS IANA Considerations INTERNET-DRAFT DNS IANA Considerations
Author's Address Author's Address
 End of changes. 7 change blocks. 
11 lines changed or deleted 14 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/