draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-05.txt | draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-06.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
skipping to change at page 1, line 13 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 13 ¶ | |||
I2RS Working Group Y. Zhuang | I2RS Working Group Y. Zhuang | |||
Internet-Draft D. Shi | Internet-Draft D. Shi | |||
Intended status: Standards Track Huawei | Intended status: Standards Track Huawei | |||
Expires: August 15, 2018 R. Gu | Expires: August 15, 2018 R. Gu | |||
China Mobile | China Mobile | |||
H. Ananthakrishnan | H. Ananthakrishnan | |||
Packet Design | Packet Design | |||
February 11, 2018 | February 11, 2018 | |||
A YANG Data Model for Fabric Topology in Data Center Networks | A YANG Data Model for Fabric Topology in Data Center Networks | |||
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-05 | draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology-06 | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
This document defines a YANG data model for fabric topology in Data | This document defines a YANG data model for fabric topology in Data | |||
Center Network. | Center Network. | |||
Status of This Memo | Status of This Memo | |||
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the | |||
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. | |||
skipping to change at page 2, line 25 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 25 ¶ | |||
3.2.1. Fabric Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | 3.2.1. Fabric Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 | |||
3.2.2. Fabric node extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | 3.2.2. Fabric node extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 | |||
3.2.3. Fabric termination-point extension . . . . . . . . . 7 | 3.2.3. Fabric termination-point extension . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
4. Fabric YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | 4. Fabric YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 | |||
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | |||
7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 7. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | |||
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | |||
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | |||
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | |||
Appendix A. Non NMDA -state modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | Appendix A. Non NMDA -state modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | |||
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 | |||
1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
Normally, a data center (DC) network is composed of single or | Normally, a data center (DC) network is composed of single or | |||
multiple fabrics which are also known as PODs (Points Of Delivery). | multiple fabrics which are also known as PODs (Points Of Delivery). | |||
These fabrics may be heterogeneous due to implementation of different | These fabrics may be heterogeneous due to implementation of different | |||
technologies when a DC network is upgraded or new techniques and | technologies when a DC network is upgraded or new techniques and | |||
features are enrolled. For example, Fabric A may use VXLAN while | features are enrolled. For example, Fabric A may use VXLAN while | |||
Fabric B may use VLAN within a DC network. Likewise, an existing | Fabric B may use VLAN within a DC network. Likewise, an existing | |||
fabric may use VXLAN while a new fabric, for example a fabric | fabric may use VXLAN while a new fabric, for example a fabric | |||
skipping to change at page 21, line 37 ¶ | skipping to change at page 21, line 37 ¶ | |||
and H. Ananthakrishnan, "A YANG Data Model for Network | and H. Ananthakrishnan, "A YANG Data Model for Network | |||
Topologies", I-D draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-06, | Topologies", I-D draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-06, | |||
September 2016. | September 2016. | |||
[I-D.draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-06] | [I-D.draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-06] | |||
Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., | Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K., | |||
and R. Wilton, "A Revised Conceptual Model for YANG | and R. Wilton, "A Revised Conceptual Model for YANG | |||
Datastores", I-D draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-06, | Datastores", I-D draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-06, | |||
October 2017. | October 2017. | |||
[I-D.draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve] | ||||
Gross, J., Ganga, I., and T. Sridhar, "Geneve: Generic | ||||
Network Virtualization Encapsulation", I-D draft-ietf- | ||||
i2rs-yang-network-topo-02, September 2017. | ||||
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate | |||
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. | |||
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "Transport Layer Security | [RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "Transport Layer Security | |||
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", August 2008, | (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", August 2008, | |||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>. | <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>. | |||
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the | [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the | |||
skipping to change at page 23, line 5 ¶ | skipping to change at page 22, line 41 ¶ | |||
[I-D.draft-ietf-i2rs-usecase-reqs-summary] | [I-D.draft-ietf-i2rs-usecase-reqs-summary] | |||
Hares, S. and M. Chen, "Summary of I2RS Use Case | Hares, S. and M. Chen, "Summary of I2RS Use Case | |||
Requirements", I-D draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams, | Requirements", I-D draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams, | |||
May 2015. | May 2015. | |||
[I-D.draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] | [I-D.draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams] | |||
Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, "YANG Tree Diagrams", I-D | Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, "YANG Tree Diagrams", I-D | |||
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams, October 2017. | draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams, October 2017. | |||
[I-D.draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve] | ||||
Gross, J., Ganga, I., and T. Sridhar, "Geneve: Generic | ||||
Network Virtualization Encapsulation", I-D draft-ietf- | ||||
nvo3-geneve-05, September 2017. | ||||
Appendix A. Non NMDA -state modules | Appendix A. Non NMDA -state modules | |||
The YANG module ietf-fabric-toplogy defined in this document augments | The YANG module ietf-fabric-toplogy defined in this document augments | |||
two modules, ietf-network and ietf-network-topology, that are | two modules, ietf-network and ietf-network-topology, that are | |||
designed to be used in conjunction with implementations that support | designed to be used in conjunction with implementations that support | |||
the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [I- | the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in [I- | |||
D.draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores]. In order to allow | D.draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores]. In order to allow | |||
implementations to use the model even in case when NMDA is not | implementations to use the model even in case when NMDA is not | |||
supported, a set of companion modules have been defined that | supported, a set of companion modules have been defined that | |||
represent a state model of networks and network topologies, ietf- | represent a state model of networks and network topologies, ietf- | |||
End of changes. 4 change blocks. | ||||
8 lines changed or deleted | 8 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.46. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |