--- 1/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-00.txt 2020-08-06 00:13:31.157372599 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-01.txt 2020-08-06 00:13:31.181372924 -0700 @@ -1,28 +1,28 @@ IPPM H. Song Internet-Draft Futurewei Intended status: Standards Track B. Gafni -Expires: August 9, 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Inc. +Expires: February 6, 2021 Mellanox Technologies, Inc. T. Zhou Z. Li Huawei F. Brockners S. Bhandari R. Sivakolundu Cisco T. Mizrahi, Ed. Huawei Smart Platforms iLab - February 6, 2020 + August 5, 2020 In-situ OAM Direct Exporting - draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-00 + draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-direct-export-01 Abstract In-situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) is used for recording and collecting operational and telemetry information. Specifically, IOAM allows telemetry data to be pushed into data packets while they traverse the network. This document introduces a new IOAM option type called the Direct Export (DEX) option, which is used as a trigger for IOAM data to be directly exported without being pushed into in-flight data packets. @@ -35,21 +35,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on August 9, 2020. + This Internet-Draft will expire on February 6, 2021. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -91,21 +91,21 @@ This document defines a new IOAM option type (also known as an IOAM type) called the Direct Export (DEX) option. This option is used as a trigger for IOAM nodes to export IOAM data to a receiving entity (or entities). A "receiving entity" in this context can be, for example, an external collector, analyzer, controller, decapsulating node, or a software module in one of the IOAM nodes. This draft has evolved from combining some of the concepts of PBT-I from [I-D.song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry] with immediate - exporting from [I-D.mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags]. + exporting from [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-flags]. 2. Conventions 2.1. Requirement Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 2.2. Terminology @@ -333,50 +333,48 @@ the use cases that the Hop_Lim/Node_ID cannot cover, and on the other hand it does not require transit switches to update the option if it is not supported or disabled. Further discussion is required about the tradeoff between the two alternatives. 8. References 8.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-data] - Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Pignataro, C., Gredler, H., - Leddy, J., Youell, S., Mizrahi, T., Mozes, D., Lapukhov, - P., remy@barefootnetworks.com, r., daniel.bernier@bell.ca, - d., and J. Lemon, "Data Fields for In-situ OAM", draft- - ietf-ippm-ioam-data-08 (work in progress), October 2019. + Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., and T. Mizrahi, "Data Fields + for In-situ OAM", draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data-10 (work in + progress), July 2020. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, . 8.2. Informative References - [I-D.mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags] + [I-D.ietf-ippm-ioam-flags] Mizrahi, T., Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., Sivakolundu, R., Pignataro, C., Kfir, A., Gafni, B., Spiegel, M., and J. - Lemon, "In-situ OAM Flags", draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam- - flags-00 (work in progress), July 2019. + Lemon, "In-situ OAM Flags", draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-flags-02 + (work in progress), July 2020. [I-D.song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry] Song, H., Zhou, T., Li, Z., Shin, J., and K. Lee, "Postcard-based On-Path Flow Data Telemetry", draft-song- - ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-06 (work in progress), - October 2019. + ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-07 (work in progress), April + 2020. [I-D.spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport] Spiegel, M., Brockners, F., Bhandari, S., and R. Sivakolundu, "In-situ OAM raw data export with IPFIX", - draft-spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport-02 (work in progress), - July 2019. + draft-spiegel-ippm-ioam-rawexport-03 (work in progress), + March 2020. [RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017, . Authors' Addresses Haoyu Song Futurewei