draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-03.txt   draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-04.txt 
NFSv4 D. Quigley NFSv4 D. Quigley
Internet-Draft Internet-Draft
Intended status: Standards Track J. Lu Intended status: Standards Track J. Lu
Expires: September 27, 2015 Oracle Expires: September 28, 2015 Oracle
T. Haynes T. Haynes
Primary Data Primary Data
March 26, 2015 March 27, 2015
Registry Specification for Mandatory Access Control (MAC) Security Label Registry Specification for Mandatory Access Control (MAC) Security Label
Formats Formats
draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-03.txt draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-04.txt
Abstract Abstract
In the past Mandatory Access Control (MAC) systems have used very In the past Mandatory Access Control (MAC) systems have used very
rigid policies which were implemented in particular protocols and rigid policies which were implemented in particular protocols and
platforms. As MAC systems became more widely deployed, additional platforms. As MAC systems became more widely deployed, additional
flexibility in mechanism and policy will be required. While flexibility in mechanism and policy will be required. While
traditional trusted systems implemented Multi-Level Security (MLS) traditional trusted systems implemented Multi-Level Security (MLS)
and integrity models, modern systems have expanded to include and integrity models, modern systems have expanded to include
technologies such as type enforcement. Due to the wide range of technologies such as type enforcement. Due to the wide range of
skipping to change at page 1, line 49 skipping to change at page 1, line 49
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 27, 2015. This Internet-Draft will expire on September 28, 2015.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 7, line 45 skipping to change at page 7, line 45
Example Label Format Specifier Updated Ranges Example Label Format Specifier Updated Ranges
Table 2 Table 2
5.4. Modifying an Existing Entry in the Registry 5.4. Modifying an Existing Entry in the Registry
A request to modify either the Description or the published label A request to modify either the Description or the published label
format specification will also require the Specification Required format specification will also require the Specification Required
IANA policy to be applied. The Designated Expert reviewer will need IANA policy to be applied. The Designated Expert reviewer will need
to determine if the published label format specification either to determine if the published label format specification either
obsoletes the Label Format Specifier or updates the label syntax and/
obsoletes the Label Format Specifier - follow the process in or model. If the Label Format Specifier is obsoleted, then the
Section 5.3 reviewer will follow the process defined in Section 5.3. Otherwise
for the update of either the label syntax and/or the model, the
updates the label syntax and/or model - approve the change. reviewer will approve the change.
6. References 6. References
6.1. Normative References 6.1. Normative References
[RFC20] Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", RFC 20, [RFC20] Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", RFC 20,
October 1969. October 1969.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
 End of changes. 5 change blocks. 
9 lines changed or deleted 9 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/