draft-ietf-rap-signaled-priority-v2-00.txt   draft-ietf-rap-signaled-priority-v2-01.txt 
Internet Draft S. Herzog Internet Draft S. Herzog
Expiration: January 2001 IPHighway Expiration: January 2001 IPHighway
File: draft-ietf-rap-signaled-priority-v2-00.txt July 2000 File: draft-ietf-rap-signaled-priority-v2-01.txt July 2000
Replaces: RFC 2751 Replaces: RFC 2751
Signaled Preemption Priority Policy Element Signaled Preemption Priority Policy Element
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with all
provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026. provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
skipping to change at page 8, line 41 skipping to change at page 8, line 41
PREEMPTION_PRI element encounters heterogeneity the PREEMPTION_PRI PREEMPTION_PRI element encounters heterogeneity the PREEMPTION_PRI
element is sent back toward receivers with the Heterogeneity error element is sent back toward receivers with the Heterogeneity error
code set. code set.
7 IANA Considerations 7 IANA Considerations
Following the policies outlined in [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS], Standard Following the policies outlined in [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS], Standard
RSVP Policy Elements (P-type values) are assigned by IETF Consensus RSVP Policy Elements (P-type values) are assigned by IETF Consensus
action as described in [RSVP-EXT]. action as described in [RSVP-EXT].
P-Type PREEMPTION_PRI is assigned the value 3. P-Type PREEMPTION_PRI is assigned the value 1.
8 Security Considerations 8 Security Considerations
The integrity of PREEMPTION_PRI is guaranteed, as any other policy The integrity of PREEMPTION_PRI is guaranteed, as any other policy
element, by the encapsulation into a Policy Data object [RSVP-EXT]. element, by the encapsulation into a Policy Data object [RSVP-EXT].
Further security mechanisms are not warranted, especially considering Further security mechanisms are not warranted, especially considering
that preemption priority aims to provide simple and quick guidance to that preemption priority aims to provide simple and quick guidance to
routers within a trusted zone or at least a single zone (no zone routers within a trusted zone or at least a single zone (no zone
boundaries are crossed). boundaries are crossed).
 End of changes. 

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.25, available from http://www.levkowetz.com/ietf/tools/rfcdiff/