draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07.txt   draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-08.txt 
Network Working Group J. Gould Network Working Group J. Gould
Internet-Draft VeriSign, Inc. Internet-Draft VeriSign, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track K. Feher Intended status: Standards Track K. Feher
Expires: August 2, 2018 Neustar Expires: November 17, 2018 Neustar
January 29, 2018 May 16, 2018
Change Poll Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Change Poll Extension for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-07 draft-ietf-regext-change-poll-08
Abstract Abstract
This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) This document describes an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
extension for notifying clients of operations on client sponsored extension for notifying clients of operations on client sponsored
objects that were not initiated by the client through EPP. These objects that were not initiated by the client through EPP. These
operations may include contractual or policy requirements including operations may include contractual or policy requirements including
but not limited to regular batch processes, customer support actions, but not limited to regular batch processes, customer support actions,
Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) or Uniform Rapid Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) or Uniform Rapid
Suspension (URS) actions, court directed actions, and bulk updates Suspension (URS) actions, court directed actions, and bulk updates
skipping to change at page 1, line 42 skipping to change at page 1, line 42
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on August 2, 2018. This Internet-Draft will expire on November 17, 2018.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 2, line 25 skipping to change at page 2, line 25
Table of Contents Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1. Conventions Used in This Document . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2. Object Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.1. Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2. State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.3. Who . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.3. Who . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.4. Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.4. Dates and Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. EPP Command Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. EPP Query Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.1. EPP Query Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.1. EPP <check> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1.1. EPP <check> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.2. EPP <info> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1.2. EPP <info> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.3. EPP <transfer> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.1.3. EPP <transfer> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2. EPP Transform Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2. EPP Transform Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.1. EPP <create> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.1. EPP <create> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.2. EPP <delete> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.2. EPP <delete> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.3. EPP <renew> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.3. EPP <renew> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.4. EPP <transfer> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.4. EPP <transfer> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2.5. EPP <update> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.5. EPP <update> Command . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
4. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 4. Formal Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
skipping to change at page 2, line 47 skipping to change at page 2, line 47
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.1. XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.1. XML Namespace . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
5.2. EPP Extension Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5.2. EPP Extension Registry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
6. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 6. Implementation Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
6.1. Verisign EPP SDK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.1. Verisign EPP SDK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6.2. Verisign Consolidated Top Level Domain (CTLD) SRS . . . . 21 6.2. Verisign Consolidated Top Level Domain (CTLD) SRS . . . . 21
6.3. Verisign .COM / .NET SRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6.3. Verisign .COM / .NET SRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
6.4. Neustar EPP SDK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6.4. Neustar EPP SDK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
9. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Appendix A. Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Appendix A. Change History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.1. Change from 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.1. Change from 00 to 01 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.2. Change from 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.2. Change from 01 to 02 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.3. Change from 02 to 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.3. Change from 02 to 03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.4. Change from 03 to 04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.4. Change from 03 to 04 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.5. Change from 04 to 05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.5. Change from 04 to 05 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.6. Change from 05 to REGEXT 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.6. Change from 05 to REGEXT 00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.7. Change from REGEXT 00 to REGEXT 01 . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.7. Change from REGEXT 00 to REGEXT 01 . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.8. Change from REGEXT 01 to REGEXT 02 . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.8. Change from REGEXT 01 to REGEXT 02 . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.9. Change from REGEXT 02 to REGEXT 03 . . . . . . . . . . . 24 A.9. Change from REGEXT 02 to REGEXT 03 . . . . . . . . . . . 24
A.10. Change from REGEXT 03 to REGEXT 04 . . . . . . . . . . . 25 A.10. Change from REGEXT 03 to REGEXT 04 . . . . . . . . . . . 25
A.11. Change from REGEXT 04 to REGEXT 05 . . . . . . . . . . . 25 A.11. Change from REGEXT 04 to REGEXT 05 . . . . . . . . . . . 25
A.12. Change from REGEXT 05 to REGEXT 06 . . . . . . . . . . . 25 A.12. Change from REGEXT 05 to REGEXT 06 . . . . . . . . . . . 25
A.13. Change from REGEXT 06 to REGEXT 07 . . . . . . . . . . . 25 A.13. Change from REGEXT 06 to REGEXT 07 . . . . . . . . . . . 25
A.14. Change from REGEXT 07 to REGEXT 08 . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the This document describes an extension mapping for version 1.0 of the
Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [RFC5730]. This mapping, an Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [RFC5730]. This mapping, an
extension to EPP object mappings like the EPP domain name mapping extension to EPP object mappings like the EPP domain name mapping
[RFC5731], is used to notify clients of operations they are not [RFC5731], is used to notify clients of operations they are not
directly involved in, on objects that the client sponsors. It is up directly involved in, on objects that the client sponsors. It is up
to server policy to determine what transform operations and clients to server policy to determine what transform operations and clients
skipping to change at page 20, line 35 skipping to change at page 20, line 35
IPR Disclosure: None IPR Disclosure: None
Status: Active Status: Active
Notes: None Notes: None
6. Implementation Status 6. Implementation Status
Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section and the reference to Note to RFC Editor: Please remove this section and the reference to
RFC 6982 [RFC6982] before publication. RFC 7942 [RFC7942] before publication.
This section records the status of known implementations of the This section records the status of known implementations of the
protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this protocol defined by this specification at the time of posting of this
Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in RFC 6982 Internet-Draft, and is based on a proposal described in RFC 7942
[RFC6982]. The description of implementations in this section is [RFC7942]. The description of implementations in this section is
intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing intended to assist the IETF in its decision processes in progressing
drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual drafts to RFCs. Please note that the listing of any individual
implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF. implementation here does not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information Furthermore, no effort has been spent to verify the information
presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not presented here that was supplied by IETF contributors. This is not
intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available intended as, and must not be construed to be, a catalog of available
implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that implementations or their features. Readers are advised to note that
other implementations may exist. other implementations may exist.
According to RFC 6982 [RFC6982], "this will allow reviewers and According to RFC 7942 [RFC7942], "this will allow reviewers and
working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the working groups to assign due consideration to documents that have the
benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable benefit of running code, which may serve as evidence of valuable
experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols experimentation and feedback that have made the implemented protocols
more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this more mature. It is up to the individual working groups to use this
information as they see fit". information as they see fit".
6.1. Verisign EPP SDK 6.1. Verisign EPP SDK
Organization: Verisign Inc. Organization: Verisign Inc.
skipping to change at page 22, line 38 skipping to change at page 22, line 38
Description: The Neustar EPP SDK includes a full client Description: The Neustar EPP SDK includes a full client
implementation of draft-ietf-regext-change-poll. implementation of draft-ietf-regext-change-poll.
Level of maturity: Production Level of maturity: Production
Coverage: All client side aspects of the protocol are implemented. Coverage: All client side aspects of the protocol are implemented.
Licensing: GNU Lesser General Public License Licensing: GNU Lesser General Public License
Contact: kal.feher@team.neustar Contact: quoc-anh.np@team.neustar
7. Security Considerations 7. Security Considerations
The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any The mapping extensions described in this document do not provide any
security services beyond those described by EPP [RFC5730] and security services beyond those described by EPP [RFC5730] and
protocol layers used by EPP. The security considerations described protocol layers used by EPP. The security considerations described
in these other specifications apply to this specification as well. in these other specifications apply to this specification as well.
8. Acknowledgements 8. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the original concept for this draft The authors wish to acknowledge the original concept for this draft
and the efforts in the initial versions of this draft by Trung Tran and the efforts in the initial versions of this draft by Trung Tran
and Sharon Wodjenski. and Sharon Wodjenski.
Special suggestions that have been incorporated into this document Special suggestions that have been incorporated into this document
were provided by Scott Hollenbeck, Michael Holloway, and Patrick were provided by Scott Hollenbeck, Michael Holloway, and Patrick
Mevzek. Mevzek.
9. Normative References 9. References
9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc- DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc2119>. editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc- DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc3688>. editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
skipping to change at page 23, line 34 skipping to change at page 23, line 36
[RFC5730] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)", [RFC5730] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)",
STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, August 2009, STD 69, RFC 5730, DOI 10.17487/RFC5730, August 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5730>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5730>.
[RFC5731] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) [RFC5731] Hollenbeck, S., "Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)
Domain Name Mapping", STD 69, RFC 5731, Domain Name Mapping", STD 69, RFC 5731,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5731, August 2009, <https://www.rfc- DOI 10.17487/RFC5731, August 2009, <https://www.rfc-
editor.org/info/rfc5731>. editor.org/info/rfc5731>.
[RFC6982] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running [RFC7942] Sheffer, Y. and A. Farrel, "Improving Awareness of Running
Code: The Implementation Status Section", RFC 6982, Code: The Implementation Status Section", BCP 205,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6982, July 2013, <https://www.rfc- RFC 7942, DOI 10.17487/RFC7942, July 2016,
editor.org/info/rfc6982>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7942>.
[RFC7451] Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451,
February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7451>.
[W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028] [W3C.REC-xmlschema-2-20041028]
Biron, P. and A. Malhotra, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Biron, P. and A. Malhotra, "XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes
Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation Second Edition", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation
REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004, REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, October 2004,
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028>. <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028>.
9.2. Informative References
[RFC7451] Hollenbeck, S., "Extension Registry for the Extensible
Provisioning Protocol", RFC 7451, DOI 10.17487/RFC7451,
February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7451>.
Appendix A. Change History Appendix A. Change History
A.1. Change from 00 to 01 A.1. Change from 00 to 01
1. Added an optional caseId element that defines the case identifier 1. Added an optional caseId element that defines the case identifier
from UDRP, URS, or custom case, based on feedback from Michael from UDRP, URS, or custom case, based on feedback from Michael
Holloway. Holloway.
A.2. Change from 01 to 02 A.2. Change from 01 to 02
skipping to change at page 26, line 5 skipping to change at page 26, line 5
1. Updates based on feedback from Scott Hollenbeck, that include: 1. Updates based on feedback from Scott Hollenbeck, that include:
1. Changed MAY to may in the Abstract. 1. Changed MAY to may in the Abstract.
2. Revised the "IANA Considerations" section to include the 2. Revised the "IANA Considerations" section to include the
registration of the XML schema. registration of the XML schema.
3. Revised the description of the <changePoll:caseId> "name" 3. Revised the description of the <changePoll:caseId> "name"
attribute and the "changePoll:operation> "op" attribute as attribute and the "changePoll:operation> "op" attribute as
containing 7-bit US-ASCII identifiers for the case type or containing 7-bit US-ASCII identifiers for the case type or
the operation type, respectively. the operation type, respectively.
A.14. Change from REGEXT 07 to REGEXT 08
1. Updated obsoleted RFC 6982 to RFC 7942.
2. Moved RFC 7451 to an informational reference based on a check
done by the Idnits Tool.
3. Changed Kal Feher's contact e-mail address.
4. Changed Neustar's Implementation Status contact e-mail address.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
James Gould James Gould
VeriSign, Inc. VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way 12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190 Reston, VA 20190
US US
Email: jgould@verisign.com Email: jgould@verisign.com
URI: http://www.verisigninc.com URI: http://www.verisigninc.com
Kal Feher Kal Feher
Neustar Neustar
lvl 8/10 Queens Road lvl 8/10 Queens Road
Melbourne, VIC 3004 Melbourne, VIC 3004
AU AU
Email: kal.feher@team.neustar Email: ietf@feherfamily.org
URI: http://www.neustar.biz URI: http://www.neustar.biz
 End of changes. 15 change blocks. 
21 lines changed or deleted 36 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.46. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/