draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03.txt   draft-ietf-repute-media-type-04.txt 
REPUTE Working Group N. Borenstein REPUTE Working Group N. Borenstein
Internet-Draft Mimecast Internet-Draft Mimecast
Intended status: Standards Track M. Kucherawy Intended status: Standards Track M. Kucherawy
Expires: December 30, 2012 June 28, 2012 Expires: May 17, 2013 November 13, 2012
A Media Type for Reputation Interchange A Media Type for Reputation Interchange
draft-ietf-repute-media-type-03 draft-ietf-repute-media-type-04
Abstract Abstract
This document defines a media type for exchanging reputation This document defines a media type for exchanging reputation
information about an arbitrary class of object. information about an arbitrary class of object.
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
skipping to change at page 1, line 31 skipping to change at page 1, line 31
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 30, 2012. This Internet-Draft will expire on May 17, 2013.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 10, line 48 skipping to change at page 10, line 48
Name: Name of the extension key Name: Name of the extension key
Description: A short description of the key's intended meaning Description: A short description of the key's intended meaning
Syntax: A description of valid values that can appear associated Syntax: A description of valid values that can appear associated
with the key with the key
6. Security Considerations 6. Security Considerations
This section describes security considerations introduced by the This document is primarily an IANA action registering a media type.
media type and content syntax defined here. It does not describe a new protocol that might introduce security
considerations.
[TBD] Discussion of the security and operational impacts of using
reputation services in general can be found throughout
[I-D.REPUTE-CONSIDERATIONS].
7. References 7. References
7.1. Normative References 7.1. Normative References
[I-D.REPUTE-MODEL] [I-D.REPUTE-MODEL]
Borenstein, N. and M. Kucherawy, "A Model for Reputation Borenstein, N. and M. Kucherawy, "A Model for Reputation
Interchange", draft-ietf-repute-model (work in progress), Interchange", draft-ietf-repute-model (work in progress),
June 2011. November 2012.
[I-D.REPUTE-QUERY-HTTP] [I-D.REPUTE-QUERY-HTTP]
Borenstein, N. and M. Kucherawy, "Reputation Data Borenstein, N. and M. Kucherawy, "Reputation Data
Interchange using HTTP and XML", Interchange using HTTP and XML",
draft-ietf-repute-query-http (work in progress), draft-ietf-repute-query-http (work in progress),
November 2011. November 2012.
[JSON] Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for [JSON] Crockford, D., "The application/json Media Type for
JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006. JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)", RFC 4627, July 2006.
[KEYWORDS] [KEYWORDS]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
7.2. Informative References 7.2. Informative References
[DKIM] Crocker, D., Ed., Hansen, T., Ed., and M. Kucherawy, Ed., [DKIM] Crocker, D., Ed., Hansen, T., Ed., and M. Kucherawy, Ed.,
"DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures", RFC 6376, "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures", RFC 6376,
September 2011. September 2011.
[HTTP] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H., [HTTP] Fielding, R., Gettys, J., Mogul, J., Frystyk, H.,
Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Masinter, L., Leach, P., and T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext
Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999. Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1", RFC 2616, June 1999.
[I-D.REPUTE-CONSIDERATIONS]
Kucherawy, M., "Operational Considerations Regarding
Reputation Services", draft-ietf-repute-model (work in
progress), November 2012.
[I-D.REPUTE-EMAIL-IDENTIFIERS] [I-D.REPUTE-EMAIL-IDENTIFIERS]
Borenstein, N. and M. Kucherawy, "A Reputation Vocabulary Borenstein, N. and M. Kucherawy, "A Reputation Vocabulary
for Email Identifiers", for Email Identifiers",
draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers (work in progress), draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers (work in progress),
November 2011. November 2012.
[IANA-CONSIDERATIONS] [IANA-CONSIDERATIONS]
Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", RFC 5226, May 2008. IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", RFC 5226, May 2008.
[MIME-REG] [MIME-REG]
Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and Freed, N. and J. Klensin, "Media Type Specifications and
Registration Procedures", RFC 4288, December 2005. Registration Procedures", RFC 4288, December 2005.
Appendix A. Acknowledgments Appendix A. Acknowledgments
 End of changes. 9 change blocks. 
9 lines changed or deleted 17 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/