draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-04.txt   draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-05.txt 
STIR M. Dolly STIR M. Dolly
Internet-Draft AT&T Internet-Draft AT&T
Intended status: Standards Track C. Wendt Intended status: Standards Track C. Wendt
Expires: May 6, 2021 Comcast Expires: July 29, 2021 Comcast
November 02, 2020 January 25, 2021
Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority Assertion Values for a Resource Priority Header Claim and a SIP Priority
Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks Header Claim in Support of Emergency Services Networks
draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-04 draft-ietf-stir-rph-emergency-services-05
Abstract Abstract
This document adds new assertion values for a Resource Priority This document adds new assertion values for a Resource Priority
Header ("rph") claim and a new SIP Priority Header claim ("sph") for Header ("rph") claim and a new SIP Priority Header claim ("sph") for
protection of the "psap-callback" value as part of the "rph" PASSporT protection of the "psap-callback" value as part of the "rph" PASSporT
extension, in support of the security of Emergency Services Networks extension, in support of the security of Emergency Services Networks
for emergency call origination and callback. for emergency call origination and callback.
Status of This Memo Status of This Memo
skipping to change at page 1, line 36 skipping to change at page 1, line 36
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on May 6, 2021. This Internet-Draft will expire on July 29, 2021.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
skipping to change at page 6, line 40 skipping to change at page 6, line 40
9. Security Considerations 9. Security Considerations
The security considerations discussed in [RFC8224], Section 12, are The security considerations discussed in [RFC8224], Section 12, are
applicable here. applicable here.
10. References 10. References
10.1. Normative References 10.1. Normative References
[I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls]
Rosen, B., "Non-Interactive Emergency Calls", draft-rosen-
stir-emergency-calls-00 (work in progress), March 2020.
[RFC4412] Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource [RFC4412] Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource
Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)",
RFC 4412, DOI 10.17487/RFC4412, February 2006, RFC 4412, DOI 10.17487/RFC4412, February 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4412>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4412>.
[RFC5031] Schulzrinne, H., "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for [RFC5031] Schulzrinne, H., "A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for
Emergency and Other Well-Known Services", RFC 5031, Emergency and Other Well-Known Services", RFC 5031,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5031, January 2008, DOI 10.17487/RFC5031, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5031>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5031>.
skipping to change at page 7, line 41 skipping to change at page 7, line 36
Token", RFC 8225, DOI 10.17487/RFC8225, February 2018, Token", RFC 8225, DOI 10.17487/RFC8225, February 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8225>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8225>.
[RFC8443] Singh, R., Dolly, M., Das, S., and A. Nguyen, "Personal [RFC8443] Singh, R., Dolly, M., Das, S., and A. Nguyen, "Personal
Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority
Authorization", RFC 8443, DOI 10.17487/RFC8443, August Authorization", RFC 8443, DOI 10.17487/RFC8443, August
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8443>. 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8443>.
10.2. Informative References 10.2. Informative References
[I-D.rosen-stir-emergency-calls]
Rosen, B., "Non-Interactive Emergency Calls", draft-rosen-
stir-emergency-calls-00 (work in progress), March 2020.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
 End of changes. 6 change blocks. 
9 lines changed or deleted 9 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/