draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-02.txt   draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03.txt 
TEAS Working Group D. Dhody TEAS Working Group D. Dhody
Internet-Draft U. Palle Internet-Draft U. Palle
Intended status: Experimental V. Kondreddy Intended status: Experimental V. Kondreddy
Expires: January 20, 2016 Huawei Technologies Expires: March 24, 2016 Huawei Technologies
R. Casellas R. Casellas
CTTC CTTC
July 19, 2015 September 21, 2015
Domain Subobjects for Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Domain Subobjects for Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic
Engineering (RSVP-TE) Engineering (RSVP-TE)
draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-02 draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03
Abstract Abstract
The Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) The Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
specification and the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching specification and the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching
(GMPLS) extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to (GMPLS) extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to
be explicitly included in a path setup. Further Exclude Routes be explicitly included in a path setup. Further Exclude Routes
extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to be extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to be
explicitly excluded in a path setup. explicitly excluded in a path setup.
skipping to change at page 1, line 43 skipping to change at page 1, line 43
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 20, 2016. This Internet-Draft will expire on March 24, 2016.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 7, line 47 skipping to change at page 7, line 47
L: The L bit is an attribute of the subobject as defined in L: The L bit is an attribute of the subobject as defined in
[RFC3209]. [RFC3209].
Type: (TBD3 by IANA) indicating IS-IS Area ID. Type: (TBD3 by IANA) indicating IS-IS Area ID.
Length: Variable. The Length MUST be at least 8, and MUST be a Length: Variable. The Length MUST be at least 8, and MUST be a
multiple of 4. multiple of 4.
Area-Len: Variable (Length of the actual (non-padded) IS-IS Area Area-Len: Variable (Length of the actual (non-padded) IS-IS Area
Identifier in octets; Valid values are from 2 to 11 inclusive). Identifier in octets; Valid values are from 1 to 13 inclusive).
Reserved: Zero at transmission, ignored at receipt. Reserved: Zero at transmission, ignored at receipt.
IS-IS Area Id: The variable-length IS-IS area identifier. Padded IS-IS Area Id: The variable-length IS-IS area identifier. Padded
with trailing zeroes to a four-byte boundary. with trailing zeroes to a four-byte boundary.
3.2.3. Mode of Operation 3.2.3. Mode of Operation
The new subobjects to support 4-Byte AS and IGP (OSPF / ISIS) Area The new subobjects to support 4-Byte AS and IGP (OSPF / ISIS) Area
could be used in the ERO to specify an abstract node (a group of could be used in the ERO to specify an abstract node (a group of
skipping to change at page 10, line 26 skipping to change at page 10, line 26
o "EXPLICIT_ROUTE subobjects": http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp- o "EXPLICIT_ROUTE subobjects": http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-
parameters/rsvp-parameters.xhtml#rsvp-parameters-25 parameters/rsvp-parameters.xhtml#rsvp-parameters-25
o "EXCLUDE_ROUTE subobjects": http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp- o "EXCLUDE_ROUTE subobjects": http://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-
parameters/rsvp-parameters.xhtml#rsvp-parameters-95 parameters/rsvp-parameters.xhtml#rsvp-parameters-95
Upon approval of this document, IANA is requested to make identical Upon approval of this document, IANA is requested to make identical
additions to these registries as follows, in sync with [PCE-DOMAIN]: additions to these registries as follows, in sync with [PCE-DOMAIN]:
Subobject Type Reference Subobject Type Reference
TBD1 4-Byte AS number [This I.D.] TBD1 4-Byte AS number [This I.D.]
TBD2 OSPF Area ID [This I.D.] TBD2 OSPF Area ID [This I.D.]
TBD3 IS-IS Area ID [This I.D.] TBD3 IS-IS Area ID [This I.D.]
6. Security Considerations 6. Security Considerations
Security considerations for MPLS-TE and GMPLS signaling are covered Security considerations for MPLS-TE and GMPLS signaling are covered
in [RFC3209] and [RFC3473]. This document does not introduce any new in [RFC3209] and [RFC3473]. This document does not introduce any new
messages or any substantive new processing, and so those security messages or any substantive new processing, and so those security
considerations continue to apply. Further, general considerations considerations continue to apply. Further, general considerations
skipping to change at page 11, line 44 skipping to change at page 11, line 44
[ISO10589] [ISO10589]
ISO, "Intermediate system to Intermediate system routing ISO, "Intermediate system to Intermediate system routing
information exchange protocol for use in conjunction with information exchange protocol for use in conjunction with
the Protocol for providing the Connectionless-mode Network the Protocol for providing the Connectionless-mode Network
Service (ISO 8473)", ISO/IEC 10589:2002, 1992. Service (ISO 8473)", ISO/IEC 10589:2002, 1992.
[PCE-DOMAIN] [PCE-DOMAIN]
Dhody, D., Palle, U., and R. Casellas, "Standard Dhody, D., Palle, U., and R. Casellas, "Standard
Representation Of Domain Sequence. (draft-ietf-pce-pcep- Representation Of Domain Sequence. (draft-ietf-pce-pcep-
domain-sequence)", April 2015. domain-sequence)", September 2015.
8.2. Informative References 8.2. Informative References
[RFC4655] Farrel, A., Vasseur, J., and J. Ash, "A Path Computation [RFC4655] Farrel, A., Vasseur, J., and J. Ash, "A Path Computation
Element (PCE)-Based Architecture", RFC 4655, Element (PCE)-Based Architecture", RFC 4655,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4655, August 2006, DOI 10.17487/RFC4655, August 2006,
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4655>. <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4655>.
[RFC4726] Farrel, A., Vasseur, J., and A. Ayyangar, "A Framework for [RFC4726] Farrel, A., Vasseur, J., and A. Ayyangar, "A Framework for
Inter-Domain Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Inter-Domain Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic
 End of changes. 7 change blocks. 
7 lines changed or deleted 7 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.42. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/