V6OPS Working Group C. Byrne Internet-Draft T-Mobile USA Intended Status: Informational D. Drown Expires:November 18, 2013January 15, 2014 A. Vizdal Deutsche Telekom AGMay 17,July 14, 2013 Extending an IPv6 /64 Prefix from a 3GPP Mobile Interface to a LANdraft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07link draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-08 Abstract This document describesthreetwo methods for extending an IPv6 /64 prefix from a User Equipment 3GPP radio interface to aLAN.LAN link. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on November 18, 2013. Copyright and License Notice Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.V6OPS Working Group draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 May 17, 2013Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. The Challenge of Providing IPv6 Addresses to a LAN link via a 3GPP UE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .3 3. Methods for Extending the 3GPP Interface /64 IPv6 Prefix to a LAN. . .link . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43.03.1 General Behavior for All Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43.1 Scenario 1: No Global Address on the UE . . . . . . . . . . 43.2 Scenario2:1: Global Address Only Assigned to LAN link . . . .. . 54 3.3 Scenario3:2: A Single Global Address Assigned to 3GPP Radio and LANInterfacelink . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6. . . 5 4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76 5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76 6. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76 7. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7V6OPS Working Group draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 May 17, 20131. Introduction 3GPP mobile cellular networks such as GSM, UMTS, and LTE have architectural support for IPv6 [RFC6459], but only 3GPP Release-10 and onwards of the 3GPP specification supports DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation [RFC3633] for delegating IPv6 prefixes to aLAN.single LAN link. To facilitate the use of IPv6 in a LAN prior to the deployment of DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation in 3GPP networks and in User Equipment (UE), this document describes how the 3GPP UE radio interface assigned global /64 prefix may be extended from the 3GPP radio interface to aLAN.LAN link. This is achieved by receiving the Router Advertisement (RA) [RFC4861] announced globally unique /64 IPv6 prefix from the 3GPP radio interface and then advertising the same IPv6 prefix to the LAN link with RA. For all of the cases in the scope of this document, the UE may be any device that functions as an IPv6 router between the 3GPP network and a LAN. This document describesthreetwo methods for achieving IPv6 prefix extension from a 3GPP radio interface to a LAN link including: 1) The 3GPP UEdoes not have a global scope IPv6 address on any interface, only link-local IPv6 addresses are present on the UE 2) The 3GPP UEonly has a global scope address on the LANinterface 3)link 2) The 3GPP UE maintains the same consistent 128 bit global scope IPv6 anycast address [RFC4291] on the 3GPP radio interface and the LANinterface.link. The LANinterfacelink is configured as a /64 and the 3GPP radio interface is configured as a /128. Section 3 describes the characteristics of each of thethreetwo approaches. 2. The Challenge of Providing IPv6 Addresses to a LAN link via a 3GPP UE As described in [RFC6459], 3GPP networks assign a /64 global scope prefix to each UE using RA. DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation is an optional part of 3GPP Release-10 and is not covered by any earlier releases. Neighbor Discovery Proxy (ND Proxy) [RFC4389] functionality has been suggested as an option for extending the assigned /64 from the 3GPP radio interface to theLAN,LAN link, but ND Proxy is an experimental protocol and has some limitations with loop-avoidance. DHCPv6 is the best way to delegate a prefix to aLAN.LAN link. The methods described in this document should only be applied when deploying DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation is not achievable in the 3GPP network and the UE. The methods described in this document are at various stages of implementation and deployment planning. The goal of this memo is to document the available methods which may be used prior to DHCPv6 deployment.V6OPS Working Group draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 May 17, 20133. Methods for Extending the 3GPP Interface /64 IPv6 Prefix to a LAN3.0link 3.1 General Behavior for All Scenarios As [RFC6459] describes, the 3GPP network assigned /64 is completely dedicated to the UE and the gateway does not consume any of the /64 addresses. The gateway routes the entire /64 to the UE and does not perform ND or Network Unreachability Detection (NUD) [RFC4861]. Communication between the UE and the gateway is only done using link- local addresses and the link is point-to-point. This allows for the UE to reliably manipulate the /64 from the 3GPP radio interface without negatively impacting the point-to-point 3GPP radio link interface. The LANinterfacelink RA configuration must be tightly coupled with the 3GPPinterfacelink state. If the 3GPPinterfacelink goes down or changes the IPv6 prefix, that state should be reflected in the LAN link IPv6 configuration. Just as in a standard IPv6 router, the packet TTL will be decremented when passing packets betweeninterfacesIPv6 links across the UE. The UE is employing the weak host model. The RA function on the UE is exclusively run on the LANinterface. 3.1link. The LAN link originated RA message carries a copy of the following 3GPP radio link received RA message option fields: o MTU (if not provided by the 3GPP network, the UE will provide its 3GPP link MTU size) o Prefix Information 3.2 Scenario 1:NoGlobal Addresson the UE InOnly Assigned to LAN link For this case, the UE receives the/64RA from the 3GPP networkviabut does not use a global address on the 3GPP interface. The 3GPP RA /64 prefix information is used to configure NDP on the LAN andsimply configures Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP) [RFC4861]assigns itself an address on the LANinterfacelink. The LAN link uses RA to announce the/64 via RA. The UE forwards all traffic destineprefix to the/64 out of theLAN. The UE LANinterface.link interface defends its LAN IPv6 address with DAD. The UE shall not run Stateless Address Autoconfiguration [RFC4862] to assign a global address on the 3GPP radio interface while routing is enabled.The 3GPP UE does not assign itself any global IPv6 addresses. Lack of global scope connectivity will limit network services running on the UE (e.g. DNS caching that requires global connectivity) and prevent proper Path MTU Discovery [RFC1981] to occur on the UE providing an IPv6 router function. The LAN attached devices have complete access to the /64, but the 3GPP UE only has link-local addresses. This method is appropriate for a use-case where the UE is only an IPv6 router that does not require any global connectivity. Below is the general procedure for this scenario: 1. The user activates router functionality for a LAN on the UE. 2. The UE checks to make sure the 3GPP interface is active and has an IPv6 address. If the interface does not have an IPv6 address, an attempt will be made to acquire one, or else the procedure will terminate. V6OPS Working Group draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 May 17, 2013 3. In this example, the UE finds the 3GPP interface has the IPv6 address 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9/64 assigned and active. 4. The UE copies the prefix 2001:db8:ac10:f002::/64 from the 3GPP interface to the LAN interface, removes the global IPv6 address configuration from the 3GPP radio interface, disables the IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) [RFC4862] feature for global addresses on the 3GPP radio interface to avoid address autoconfiguration, and begins announcing the global prefix 2001:db8:ac10:f002::/64 via RA to the LAN. The 3GPP interface and LAN interface only maintain link-local addresses while the UE uses RA to announce the /64 to the LAN. 5. Since the UE and gateway do not assign any of the addresses from the /64, there is no chance of an address conflict on the 3GPP radio interface. On the LAN interface, there is no chance of an address conflict since the hosts on the LAN will use Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) [RFC4862]. 3.2 Scenario 2: Global Address Only Assigned to LAN For this case, the UE receives the RA from the 3GPP network but does not use a global address on the 3GPP interface. The 3GPP RA /64 prefix information is used to configure NDP on the LAN and assigns itself an address on the LAN link. The LAN interface uses RA to announce the prefix to the LAN. The UE LAN interface defends its LAN IPv6 address with DAD. The UE shall not run Stateless Address Autoconfiguration [RFC4862] to assign a global address on the 3GPP radio interface while routing is enabled. This method allowsThis method allows the UE to originate and terminate IPv6 communications as a host while acting as an IPv6 router. The movement of the IPv6 prefix from the 3GPP radio interface to the LANinterfacelink may result in long-lived data connections being terminated during the transition from a host-only mode to router-and-host mode. Connections which are likely to be effected are ones that have been specifically bound to the 3GPP radio interface. This method is appropriate if the UE or software on the UE cannot support multiple interfaces with the same anycast IPv6 address and the UE requires global connectivity while acting as a router. Below is the general procedure for this scenario: 1. The user activates router functionality for a LAN on the UE. 2. The UE checks to make sure the 3GPP interface is active and has an IPv6 address. If the interface does not have an IPv6 address, an attempt will be made to acquire one, or else the procedure will terminate.V6OPS Working Group draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 May 17, 20133. In this example, the UE finds the 3GPP interface has the IPv6 address 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9 assigned and active. 4. The UE moves the address 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9 as a /64 from the 3GPP interfaces to the LAN link interface, disables the IPv6 SLAAC feature on the 3GPP radio interface to avoid address autoconfiguration, and begins announcing the prefix 2001:db8:ac10:f002::/64 via RA to the LAN. For this example, the LAN has 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9/64 and the 3GPP radio only has a link-local address. 5. The UE directly processes all packets destined to itself at 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9. 6. The UE, acting as a router running NDP on the LAN, will route packets to and from the LAN. IPv6 packets passing between interfaces will have the TTL decremented. 7. On the LAN link interface, there is no chance of address conflict since the address is defended using DAD. The 3GPP radio interface only has a link-localaddresses.address. 3.3 Scenario3:2: A Single Global Address Assigned to 3GPP Radio and LANInterfacelink In this method, the UE assigns itself one address from the 3GPP network RA announced /64. This one address is configured as anycast [RFC4291] on both the 3GPP radiointerfacelink as a /128 and on the LANinterfacelink as a /64. This allows the UE to maintain long lived data connections since the 3GPP radio interface address does not change when the router function is activated. This method may cause complications for certain software that may not support multiple interfaces with the same anycast IPv6 address or are sensitive to prefix length changes. This method also creates complications for ensuring uniqueness for Privacy Extensions [RFC4941]. When Privacy Extensionsshouldare in use all temporary addresses will bedisabled oncopied from the 3GPP radio interfacewhile this method is enabled.to the LAN link and the preferred and valid lifetimes will be synchronized, such that the temporary anycast addresses on both interfaces expire simultaneously. There might also be more complex scenarios in which the prefix length is not changed and privacy extensions are supported by having the subnet span multiple interfaces, as ND Proxy does [RFC4389]. Further elaboration is out of scope of the present document. Below is the general procedure for this scenario:V6OPS Working Group draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 May 17, 20131. The user activates router functionality for a LAN on the UE. 2. The UE checks to make sure the 3GPPinterfacesinterface is active and has an IPv6 address. If the interface does not have an IPv6 address, an attempt will be made to acquire one, or else the procedure will terminate. 3. In this example, the UE finds the 3GPP interface has the IPv6 address 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9 assigned and active. 4. The UE moves the address 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9 as an anycast /64 from the 3GPP interface to the LAN interface and begins announcing the prefix 2001:db8:ac10:f002::/64 via RA to the LAN. The 3GPP interface maintains the same IPv6 anycast address with a /128. For this example, the LAN has 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9/64 and the 3GPP radio interface has 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9/128. 5. The UE directly processes all packets destined to itself at 2001:db8:ac10:f002:1234:4567:0:9. 6. On the LAN interface, there is no chance of address conflict since the address is defended using DAD. The 3GPP radio interface only has a /128 and no other systems on the 3GPP radio point-to-point link may use the global /64. 4. Security ConsiderationsSince Scenario 3.3 does not allow for Privacy Extension to run on the 3GPP interface, UEs that require this functionality must find an alternative method or only associate the IPv6 Privacy Extension procedure on the LAN.tbd 5. IANA Considerations This document does not require any action from IANA. 6. Acknowledgments Many thanks for review and discussion from Dave Thaler, Sylvain Decremps, Mark Smith, Dmitry Anipko, Masanobu Kawashima, Teemu Savolainen, Mikael Abrahamsson, Eric Vyncke, Alexandru Petrescu, Jouni Korhonen,andLorenzo Colitti, JulienLaganier.Laganier and Owen DeLong. 7. Informative References [RFC1981] McCann, J., Deering, S., and J. Mogul, "Path MTU DiscoveryV6OPS Working Group draft-ietf-v6ops-64share-07 May 17, 2013for IP version 6", RFC 1981, August 1996. [RFC3633] Troan, O. and R. Droms, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6", RFC 3633, December 2003. [RFC4291] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture", RFC 4291, February 2006. [RFC4389] Thaler, D., Talwar, M., and C. Patel, "Neighbor Discovery Proxies (ND Proxy)", RFC 4389, April 2006. [RFC4861] Narten, T., Nordmark, E., Simpson, W., and H. Soliman, "Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6)", RFC 4861, September 2007. [RFC4862] Thomson, S., Narten, T., and T. Jinmei, "IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration", RFC 4862, September 2007. [RFC4941] Narten, T., Draves, R., and S. Krishnan, "Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6", RFC 4941, September 2007.[RFC6459] Korhonen, J., Ed., Soininen, J., Patil, B., Savolainen, T., Bajko, G., and K. Iisakkila, "IPv6 in 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Evolved Packet System (EPS)", RFC 6459, January 2012.Authors' Addresses Cameron Byrne T-Mobile USA Bellevue, Washington, USA EMail: Cameron.Byrne@T-Mobile.com Dan Drown Email: Dan@Drown.org Ales Vizdal Deutsche Telekom AG Tomickova 2144/1 Prague, 149 00 Czech Republic EMail:Ales.Vizdal@t-mobile.czAles.Vizdal@T-Mobile.cz