draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-10.txt   draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11.txt 
Audio/Video Transport Working Group A. Clark Audio/Video Transport Working Group A. Clark
Internet-Draft Telchemy Internet-Draft Telchemy
Intended status: Standards Track G. Zorn Intended status: Standards Track G. Zorn
Expires: June 17, 2013 Network Zen Expires: June 22, 2013 Network Zen
Q. Wu Q. Wu
Huawei Huawei
December 14, 2012 December 19, 2012
RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Discard Count RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Discard Count
metric Reporting metric Reporting
draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-10.txt draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11.txt
Abstract Abstract
This document defines an RTP Control Protocol(RTCP) Extended Report This document defines an RTP Control Protocol(RTCP) Extended Report
(XR) Block that allows the reporting of a simple discard count metric (XR) Block that allows the reporting of a simple discard count metric
for use in a range of RTP applications. for use in a range of RTP applications.
Status of this Memo Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
skipping to change at page 1, line 36 skipping to change at page 1, line 36
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 17, 2013. This Internet-Draft will expire on June 22, 2013.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 2, line 34 skipping to change at page 2, line 34
5.1. New RTCP XR Block Type value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.1. New RTCP XR Block Type value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
5.3. Contact information for registrations . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.3. Contact information for registrations . . . . . . . . . . 10
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 8. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Appendix A. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Appendix A. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
A.1. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-10 . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.1. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11 . . . . . . . . . . 15
A.2. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-09 . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.2. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-10 . . . . . . . . . . 15
A.3. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-08 . . . . . . . . . . 15 A.3. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-09 . . . . . . . . . . 15
A.4. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-08 . . . . . . . . . . 15
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
1. Introduction 1. Introduction
1.1. Discard Count Report Block 1.1. Discard Count Report Block
This document defines a new block type to augment those defined in This document defines a new block type to augment those defined in
[RFC3611] for use in a range of RTP applications. The new block type [RFC3611] for use in a range of RTP applications. The new block type
supports the reporting of the number of packets which are received supports the reporting of the number of packets which are received
correctly but are never played out, typically because they arrive too correctly but are never played out, typically because they arrive too
skipping to change at page 3, line 27 skipping to change at page 3, line 27
This metric is useful for identifying the existence, and This metric is useful for identifying the existence, and
characterizing the severity, of a packet transport problem which may characterizing the severity, of a packet transport problem which may
affect users' perception of a service delivered over RTP. affect users' perception of a service delivered over RTP.
This block may be used in conjunction with [BGDISCARD] which provides This block may be used in conjunction with [BGDISCARD] which provides
additional information on the pattern of discarded packets. However additional information on the pattern of discarded packets. However
the metric in [BGDISCARD] may be used independently of the metrics in the metric in [BGDISCARD] may be used independently of the metrics in
this block. this block.
In case of Discard count metric block sent together with Burst gap In case of Discard count Metrics Block sent together with Burst gap
discard metric block defined in [BGDISCARD] to the media sender or discard Metrics Block defined in [BGDISCARD] to the media sender or
RTP based network management system, information carried in the RTP based network management system, information carried in the
discard count metric block and Burst gap discard metric block allows discard count Metrics Block and Burst gap discard Metrics Block
them calculate the some bust gap summary statistics, e.g., gap allows them calculate the some bust gap summary statistics, e.g., gap
discard rate. discard rate.
The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end system The metric belongs to the class of transport-related end system
metrics defined in [RFC6792]. metrics defined in [RFC6792].
1.2. RTCP and RTCP XR Reports 1.2. RTCP and RTCP XR Reports
The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in [RFC3550]. [RFC3611] The use of RTCP for reporting is defined in [RFC3550]. [RFC3611]
defined an extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended defined an extensible structure for reporting using an RTCP Extended
Report (XR). This document defines a new Extended Report block for Report (XR). This document defines a new Extended Report block for
skipping to change at page 6, line 11 skipping to change at page 6, line 11
metric defined in [RFC5725] is available to report on packets metric defined in [RFC5725] is available to report on packets
which are not recovered by any repair techniques which may be in which are not recovered by any repair techniques which may be in
use. use.
3. Discard Count Metric Report Block 3. Discard Count Metric Report Block
Metrics in this block report on the number of packets discarded in Metrics in this block report on the number of packets discarded in
the stream arriving at the RTP end system. The measurement of these the stream arriving at the RTP end system. The measurement of these
metrics is made at the receiving end of the RTP stream. Instances of metrics is made at the receiving end of the RTP stream. Instances of
this Metrics Block refer by SSRC to the separate auxiliary this Metrics Block refer by SSRC to the separate auxiliary
Measurement Information block [RFC6776] which contains measurement Measurement Information block [RFC6776] which describes measurement
intervals. This metric block relies on the measurement interval in Intervals in use. This Metrics Block relies on the measurement
the Measurement Information block indicating the span of the report interval in the Measurement Information block indicating the span of
and should be sent in the same compound RTCP packet as the the report and should be sent in the same compound RTCP packet as the
measurement information block. If the measurement interval is not measurement information block. If the measurement interval is not
received in the same compound RTCP packet as this metric block, this received in the same compound RTCP packet as this Metrics Block, this
metric block should be discarded. Metrics Block should be discarded.
3.1. Report Block Structure 3.1. Report Block Structure
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| BT=PDC | I |DT | resv.| block length = 2 | | BT=PDC | I |DT | resv.| block length = 2 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SSRC of Source | | SSRC of Source |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
skipping to change at page 7, line 20 skipping to change at page 7, line 20
00: Report packet discarded or being thrown away before playout 00: Report packet discarded or being thrown away before playout
due to packets duplication. due to packets duplication.
01: Report packet discarded due to too early to be played out. 01: Report packet discarded due to too early to be played out.
10: Report packet discarded due to too late to be played out. 10: Report packet discarded due to too late to be played out.
The value DT=11 is reserved for future definition and MUST NOT be The value DT=11 is reserved for future definition and MUST NOT be
used. used.
An endpoint MAY report only one of the above three discard types An endpoint MAY report any combination of discard types in each
blocks in an compound RTCP report in a reporting interval. It MAY reporting interval by including several Discard Count Metric
also report a combination of any two discard types in a compound Report Blocks in a single RTCP XR packet.
RTCP report. The endpoint MAY report duplicate packet discard
(DT=0) block with the other two discard (DT=1, 2) blocks.
Some systems send duplicate RTP packets for robustness or error Some systems send duplicate RTP packets for robustness or error
resilience. This is NOT RECOMMENDED since it breaks RTCP packet resilience. This is NOT RECOMMENDED since it breaks RTCP packet
statistics. If duplication is desired for error resilience, the statistics. If duplication is desired for error resilience, the
mechanism described in [RTPDUP] can be used, since this will not mechanism described in [RTPDUP] can be used, since this will not
cause breakage of RTP streams or RTCP statistics. cause breakage of RTP streams or RTCP statistics.
Reserved (resv): 4 bits Reserved (resv): 4 bits
These bits are reserved. They MUST be set to zero by senders and These bits are reserved. They MUST be set to zero by senders and
ignored by receivers. ignored by receivers (See RFC6709 section 4.2).
block length: 16 bits block length: 16 bits
The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one and The length of this report block in 32-bit words, minus one, in
MUST be set to 2,, in accordance with the definition of this field accordance with the definition in[RFC3611] . This field MUST be
in [RFC3611]. The block MUST be discarded if the block length is set to 2 to match the fixed length of the report block. The block
set to a different value. MUST be discarded if the block length is set to a different value.
SSRC of source: 32 bits SSRC of source: 32 bits
As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611]. As defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC3611].
number of packets discarded: 32 bits number of packets discarded: 32 bits
Number of packets discarded over the period (Interval or Number of packets discarded over the period (Interval or
Cumulative) covered by this report. Cumulative) covered by this report.
skipping to change at page 9, line 8 skipping to change at page 9, line 8
Note that the number of packets expected in the period associated Note that the number of packets expected in the period associated
with this metric (whether interval or cumulative) is available with this metric (whether interval or cumulative) is available
from the difference between a pair of extended sequence numbers in from the difference between a pair of extended sequence numbers in
the Measurement Information block [RFC6776], so need not be the Measurement Information block [RFC6776], so need not be
repeated in this block. repeated in this block.
4. SDP Signaling 4. SDP Signaling
[RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol) [RFC3611] defines the use of SDP (Session Description Protocol)
[RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks. XR blocks MAY be used [RFC4566] for signaling the use of XR blocks. However XR blocks MAY
without prior signaling. be used without prior signaling (see section 5 of RFC3611).
4.1. SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension 4.1. SDP rtcp-xr-attrib Attribute Extension
This section augments the SDP [RFC4566] attribute "rtcp-xr" defined This section augments the SDP [RFC4566] attribute "rtcp-xr" defined
in [RFC3611] by providing an additional value of "xr-format" to in [RFC3611] by providing an additional value of "xr-format" to
signal the use of the report block defined in this document. signal the use of the report block defined in this document.
xr-format =/ xr-pdc-block xr-format =/ xr-pdc-block
xr-pdc-block = "pkt-dscrd-count" xr-pdc-block = "pkt-dscrd-count"
4.2. Offer/Answer Usage 4.2. Offer/Answer Usage
When SDP is used in offer-answer context, the SDP Offer/Answer usage When SDP is used in offer-answer context, the SDP Offer/Answer usage
defined in [RFC3611] for unilateral "rtcp-xr" attribute parameters defined in [RFC3611] for unilateral "rtcp-xr" attribute parameters
applies. For detailed usage in Offer/Answer for unilateral applies. For detailed usage of Offer/Answer for unilateral
parameter, refer to section 5.2 of [RFC3611]. parameter, refer to section 5.2 of [RFC3611].
5. IANA Considerations 5. IANA Considerations
New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. For New block types for RTCP XR are subject to IANA registration. For
general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to general guidelines on IANA considerations for RTCP XR, refer to
[RFC3611]. [RFC3611].
5.1. New RTCP XR Block Type value 5.1. New RTCP XR Block Type value
This document assigns the block type value PDC in the IANA "RTCP XR This document assigns the block type value PDC in the IANA " RTP
Block Type Registry" to the "Discard Count Metrics Block". Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Block Type Registry " to
the "Discard Count Metrics Block".
[Note to RFC Editor: please replace PDC with the IANA provided RTCP [Note to RFC Editor: please replace PDC with the IANA provided RTCP
XR block type for this block.] XR block type for this block.]
5.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter 5.2. New RTCP XR SDP Parameter
This document also registers a new parameter "pkt-dscrd-count" in the This document also registers a new parameter "pkt-dscrd-count" in the
"RTCP XR SDP Parameters Registry". " RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR) Session Description
Protocol (SDP) Parameters Registry ".
5.3. Contact information for registrations 5.3. Contact information for registrations
The following contact information is provided for all The following contact information is provided for all
registrations in this document: registrations in this document:
Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com) Qin Wu (sunseawq@huawei.com)
101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012 Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012
skipping to change at page 13, line 13 skipping to change at page 13, line 13
Geoff Hunt wrote the initial draft of this document. Geoff Hunt wrote the initial draft of this document.
8. Acknowledgments 8. Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge reviews and feedback provided by The authors gratefully acknowledge reviews and feedback provided by
Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Bob Biskner, Kevin Connor, Bruce Adams, Philip Arden, Amit Arora, Bob Biskner, Kevin Connor,
Claus Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Jim Frauenthal, Albert Higashi, Claus Dahm, Randy Ethier, Roni Even, Jim Frauenthal, Albert Higashi,
Tom Hock, Shane Holthaus, Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Keith Lantz, Tom Hock, Shane Holthaus, Paul Jones, Rajesh Kumar, Keith Lantz,
Mohamed Mostafa, Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi Mohamed Mostafa, Amy Pendleton, Colin Perkins, Mike Ramalho, Ravi
Raviraj, Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, and Hideaki Yamada,Kevin Raviraj, Albrecht Schwarz, Tom Taylor, and Hideaki Yamada,Kevin
Gross, Varun Singh, Claire Bi, Roni Even, Dan Romascanu. Gross, Varun Singh, Claire Bi, Roni Even, Dan Romascanu and Jonathan
Lennox.
9. References 9. References
9.1. Normative References 9.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", March 1997. Requirement Levels", March 1997.
[RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time [RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time
Applications", RFC 3550, July 2003. Applications", RFC 3550, July 2003.
[RFC3611] Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control [RFC3611] Friedman, T., Caceres, R., and A. Clark, "RTP Control
Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", November 2003. Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR)", November 2003.
[RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session [RFC4566] Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session
Description Protocol", July 2006. Description Protocol", July 2006.
[RFC6709] Carpenter, B., Aboba, B., and S. Cheshire, "Design
Considerations for Protocol Extensions", RFC 6709,
September 2012.
[RFC6776] Hunt, G., "Measurement Identity and information Reporting
using SDES item and XR Block", RFC 6776, October 2012.
9.2. Informative References 9.2. Informative References
[BGDISCARD] [BGDISCARD]
Hunt, G., "RTCP XR Report Block for Burst Gap Discard Hunt, G., "RTCP XR Report Block for Burst Gap Discard
metric Reporting", metric Reporting",
ID draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-06, ID draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-06,
October 2012. October 2012.
[RFC4588] Rey, J., "RTP Retransmission Payload Format", RFC 4588, [RFC4588] Rey, J., "RTP Retransmission Payload Format", RFC 4588,
July 2006. July 2006.
[RFC5109] Li, A., "RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error [RFC5109] Li, A., "RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error
Correction", RFC 5109, July 2006. Correction", RFC 5109, July 2006.
[RFC5725] Begen, A., "RTCP XR Report Block for Post-Repair Loss [RFC5725] Begen, A., "RTCP XR Report Block for Post-Repair Loss
metric Reporting", RFC 5725, February 2010. metric Reporting", RFC 5725, February 2010.
[RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Framework for Performance Metric [RFC6390] Clark, A. and B. Claise, "Framework for Performance Metric
Development", RFC 6390, October 2011. Development", RFC 6390, October 2011.
[RFC6776] Hunt, G., "Measurement Identity and information Reporting
using SDES item and XR Block", RFC 6776, October 2012.
[RFC6792] Wu, Q., "Monitoring Architectures for RTP", RFC 6792, [RFC6792] Wu, Q., "Monitoring Architectures for RTP", RFC 6792,
November 2012. November 2012.
[RTPDUP] Begen, A. and C. Perkins, "Duplicating RTP Streams", [RTPDUP] Begen, A. and C. Perkins, "Duplicating RTP Streams",
ID draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-duplication-00, July 2012. ID draft-ietf-avtext-rtp-duplication-00, July 2012.
Appendix A. Change Log Appendix A. Change Log
Note to the RFC-Editor: please remove this section prior to Note to the RFC-Editor: please remove this section prior to
publication as an RFC. publication as an RFC.
A.1. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-10 A.1. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-11
The following are the major changes compared to previous version:
o Editorial change t based on SDP Directorate and Colin's Review.
A.2. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-10
The following are the major changes compared to previous version: The following are the major changes compared to previous version:
o Editorial change to get in line with recently discussed drafts. o Editorial change to get in line with recently discussed drafts.
o Remove DT=3 based on the discussion to summary statistics draft. o Remove DT=3 based on the discussion to summary statistics draft.
A.2. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-09 A.3. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-09
The following are the major changes compared to previous version: The following are the major changes compared to previous version:
o SDP Duplicated Parameter Deleting. o SDP Duplicated Parameter Deleting.
A.3. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-08 A.4. draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-discard-08
The following are the major changes compared to previous version: The following are the major changes compared to previous version:
o Outdated reference update. o Outdated reference update.
o Editorial changes based on comments that applied to PDV and Delay o Editorial changes based on comments that applied to PDV and Delay
drafts. drafts.
Authors' Addresses Authors' Addresses
 End of changes. 22 change blocks. 
40 lines changed or deleted 52 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/